Accessories 26 and 27 – The State Hornet

[ad_1]

This November midterm election, voting students in Sacramento State have the opportunity to vote on two proposals that will impact Native tribes and their communities. Propositions 26 and 27 seek to expand gambling, gambling, and betting on and off California tribal lands.

While these proposals have garnered support from some California tribes and businesses, there is an area of ​​mixed emotions within the Bag State community.

Proposal 26 will allow in-person sports betting, roulette and dice games on tribal lands and racetracks. However, betting on California high schools and California college sports teams will be prohibited. The revenue generated would fund gambling addiction and mental health programs. It would also fund sports betting regulation and enforcement and the state’s general fund.

Proposition 27 will allow online gambling and sports betting outside of tribal lands. The revenue generated would be used to fund the regulation of online gambling and betting and to fund homelessness programs.

Cesar Rodriguez, 21, stands outside University Union at Sac State Thursday, Oct. 13, 2022. He hopes to partake in sports betting without worrying about legal issues if Proposition 27 passes. (Elisabeth Meza)

Maj. Cesar Rodriguez, 21, is a Proponent of Proposition 27. As a sports fan, Rodgriguez finds legalizing sports betting to be another way for fans to interact with sports.

He acknowledged the opposition’s concern about gambling raised by the opposition, but said addiction of any type will always exist and gambling is no different.

“I can see that [gambling addiction concern] but there’s also a ton of other things your kid can do too, like that can be said for alcohol or other things,” Rodriguez said.

He added that other states have regulations and rules to make sure players are 21 and older, so it wouldn’t be different if he were adopted in California.

Sobhan Ahmadzai, 20, inside the gambling hall at University Union on Thursday, October 13, 2022. “In my opinion, sports betting is a much more thoughtful and fun process,” Admadzai said. He plans to vote in favor of Proposition 27 in November. (Elisabeth Meza)

Biological sciences major Sobhan Ahmadzai, 20, is also in favor of Proposition 27. Ahmadzai has been involved in fantasy sports betting in the past and would be willing to bet on the outcome of live sporting events if Proposition 27 were adopted.

“It would be a lot more streamlined and advertised, which is good,” Ahmadzai said. “Everyone should be able to do it. It’s a lot of fun and it’s a way to earn money.

Fantasy sports has the concept of creating a virtual or imaginary team of real players of a professional sport. These teams compete against each other based on the statistical performance of their players from real games, allowing participants to act as a team owner and swap players as they wish.

Ahmadzai competed in fantasy football leagues with his friends and family who each bet $20 on the teams they created.

According to CNN, fantasy sports betting is legal because it is classified as a game of skill instead of a game of chance.

“I recently saw the ad for Proposition 27,” Ahmadzai said. “That was quite interesting to hear, I thought ‘that’s a good point.’ People are going crazy at the casino and spending $4000 in one night and people can’t even do sports betting.

Although information about the proposals is publicly available, some students are unsure if they can vote.

Abigayle Mercado, 18, playing table tennis in the University Union games room on Thursday, September 29. She plans to vote for the first time in November, including on Proposals 26 and 27. (Tierra Tilby)

Graphic design major Abigayle Mercado, 18, has seen all the ads and commercials on Propositions 26 and 27.

“I think it has something to do with playing with Native American tribes and how they want to expand that within the state,” Mercado said. “From what I heard, it would bring them [Native American tribes] lose a lot of money they earn from gambling establishments. This would obviously hurt them.

This November will be Mercado’s first vote. She said she plans to do more research by then to better understand the two proposals.

Rose Soza War Soldier, assistant professor of Native American studies in the ethnic studies department, said the proposals could be confusing.

Soldier said the political rhetoric about how the revenue from the proposals will be used shows a lack of transparency. She explained how Proposition 27 frames potential revenue used to fund education and homeless programs, but did not mention how out-of-state corporations, which supported the proposition, would benefit if it were to. be adopted.

“It is feared that what Proposition 27 would do is that it is in effect an attack on the rights of Indians to have games.” said the soldier.

She went on to explain how this would affect the tribes economically by highlighting when California legalized gambling. Reno and Las Vegas saw a decrease in the number of California visitors who had no reason to travel out of state to gamble.

“If people can gamble on their mobile phones, will they want to travel and go to the casino? said the soldier.

Maria Elena Pulido-Sepulveda, a descendant of the Caxcan Otomí tribe and a sociology student at Sac State, stands outside near Lassen Hall on September 29, 2022. Pulido-Sepulveda is a member of the Ensuring Native Indian Traditions council at Sac State. (Elisabeth Meza)

Maria Elena Pulido-Sepulveda, a descendant of the Caxcan Otomí tribe, is a sociology student at Sac State.

“Looks like they are pitting tribes against tribes. It’s unfortunate because the tribes had to fight very hard for playing rights,” Pulido-Sepulveda said.

According to Pulido-Sepulveda, the recent push to legalize sports betting outside of casinos is also unfair to those who have been punished for online gambling and gambling in the past.

“As a Sacramento resident, I know there were internet cafes in South Sac that were penalized and criminalized for having online gambling,” Pulido-Sepulveda said. “People were mostly Asian immigrants. We gave files to these people. Now we say “there are these big companies that want this to happen, so let’s make it happen”.

Pulido-Sepulveda said it is important that students are well informed about these proposals and encourage them to exercise their right to vote.

“Even if you think these proposals are good, don’t be afraid to defend them. Just inform yourself,” she said.

Defenders against proposition 27 claim that legalizing online gambling would drive business away from Indian casinos and health, education and housing funds from tribal communities.

For more information on the proposals, visit the Office of the Legislative Analyst.

[ad_2]
Source link

Back To Top